Fascinated to know what Montgomery's horological specifications are. I collect vintage wristwatches, but maybe wind-up is not what MM is thinking about.
I can't sally forth without a wristwatch. Underwear I can do without, but not a watch. Weren't watches considered proof of sexual deviance in the 1920s/1930s?
4 comments:
hehe.... haven't worn a watch in eons.
Fascinated to know what Montgomery's horological specifications are. I collect vintage wristwatches, but maybe wind-up is not what MM is thinking about.
I can't sally forth without a wristwatch. Underwear I can do without, but not a watch. Weren't watches considered proof of sexual deviance in the 1920s/1930s?
never heard that abt watches. I recall slave bracelets in the 20s & pinkie rings in the 50s.
Oh that's right, cinemage books, feed my fantasies. Swell! (Pardon the pun.)
Post a Comment